Sourced based essay

Reviewer: Dea Abzhandadze: I like how you used evidence from the article to show the validation of the author’s stance, but I would not use the word “seems” because it would make the author’s stance sound questionable and uncertain. Speaking from my perspective I would choose either the negative effects or the positive and show the connection of the rhetorical device to the analysis but so far it’s good!



Peer Review in Comp in Two Genres

Below are the suggestions to Nafisha from the peers

Nafisha Ahmed: After reading the composition in two genres I can conclude that the paper is well written, it is very easy to read and understandable she seems to be knowledgeable about her topic even though I am not quite sure why she choose to target the audience that she did that’s actually interesting because she could’ve chosen from a wider variety of target audience yet she decided to target only college freshmen it would be interesting to know the reasoning behind that. I am currently unsure of what to improve as my work is not perfect either however I feel that she definitely meets all criteria and made her writing clear and precise.

Nafisha Ahmed: The paper responds extremely well to the criteria. Her paragraphs clearly talk about the problems and influence of social media and its audience. It’s really easy to read and understand and she sounds very knowledgeable about the topic.

Tanim to Nafisha Ahmed 

Rationale: Her paragraphs are well developed and easy to follow. It answers all the questions and requirements needed for the assignment. Since she is in progress for most of the work, it looks good so far. Her wording helps the reader to have a deeper understanding. It makes her sound credible and she knows what she is talking about. 

Compositions: Yes, her reflection corresponds with her rationale. Basically, expand on what she was saying in the previous paragraphs before. In my opinion, everything looks to be progressing. Just finish up two genres and put everything in order.

Nafisha: Rationale: The paper responds to the criteria accurately with its audience and purpose. The paragraphs are well developed with their answers. Yes, they use precise words or even metaphors. It is easy to read and understand. The writer sounds knowledgeable and trustworthy. 

Compositions: The composition does correspond to the rationale, and it looks like a working process. They are both visual, I do not have to read like the writer has mentioned, making it simple and easy. Nothing confusing, just want the images bigger. Maybe separate the images, which is something I am doing to make the images look bigger and easier to see. That is all I have since there is not much and it still is a working progress 



Peer-Review Directions for Audience Strategy & Potential Genres Proposal

Nafisha Ahmed (Farhan Chowdhury the reviewer)

Audience Strategy: I was really impressed at Nafisha’s organization as she had everything down and answered every question. If I had to improve on one thing, it would definitely be using more concise language. For example, on where she answered the audience she was addressing, she could’ve used “target” instead of “focus” to make it more specific. 

Potential genres: The author was very concise in what they had to say and was straight to the point. However, while I was reading their draft I noticed she hasn’t concluded it to two final genres. She should figure out which of the genres she listed would make the most impact on her topic. By her suggestion, after rereading I noticed she hasn’t completely answered the third question and is also a thing she could work on. She used precise words on this draft and overall wrote a good draft due to it being concise and easy to understand.